1 - A MORE RELIABLE KEYBED! The RH3 is the nicest keybed I've ever played. So to have so many consistent problems reported about it is really frustrating! What I don't understand is, the RH3 is also used on the M50, M3, and Kronos. They don't seem to have the same problems. Or if they do, the respective forums don't show it. Did they use a different quality on the SV-1 keybed?
2. - SOUNDS TAKEN FROM THE NEW KRONOS TECHNOLOGY. I thought the SV sounded great until I played the Kronos! I recall reading somewhere on this forum that the sounds on the Kronos were all new, not derived from the SV. And it shows. The pianos are breathtaking, as are all the EP's, organs etc. Throw some select vintage sounds from the Kronos into a retro styled cavity and you'll have a KILLER keyboard KORG!!!!
3. - Speaking of cavity, how about a BROADER BODY DESIGN CAPABLE OF HOLDING A SMALL MONO SYNTH. I personally love the design of the SV-1. I think it's a big part of it's selling appeal. But the depth and curve of the current style are just a bit frustratingly short of holding my Moog LP! I think I speak for many keyboardists when I say a deeper flat design would help out a lot and add to the retro vibe of stacking your boards!
4. - MORE SUBTLETY OVER THE CONTROLS - Amp drive, wah etc. It's all been said before. We need more control and gradual changes in fx, amps etc.
So when can I expect the SV-2, this fall?
