|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
danatkorg Product Manager, Korg R&D
Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 4204 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
rbox wrote: | It is interesting if you measure the differents before and after the 1.3 Update in point of:
-Audiospectrum of the samples
-Audiospectrum of combi's and all over System
-latency if you switch Programms
-latency if you press the Keys and the samples/programm start to play
the waveform |
Please do, if you wish. You will find no differences in any aspect of audio quality, latency, number of voices, etc.
This compression is completely lossless. During playback, the samples are bit-for-bit identical to the uncompressed versions.
Best regards,
Dan _________________ Dan Phillips
Manager of Product Development, Korg R&D
Personal website: www.danphillips.com
For technical support, please contact your Korg Distributor: http://www.korg.co.jp/English/Distributors/
Regretfully, I cannot offer technical support directly.
If you need to contact me for purposes other than technical support, please do not send PMs; instead, send email to dan@korgrd.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StephenKay KARMA Developer Approved Merchant
Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 2979 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
rbox wrote: | So why now must the Samples compressed and not 2005?Has the aspect of Soundquality to change in a another direction??Is the Bussystem for
uncompressed Samples too slow? |
You are getting all worked up about nothing. Trust me (or not). When they say it is lossless, it is lossless. That's why they didn't get back a savings of half of the memory or something. I know how it's being done, it's not my place to reveal it here, but it's lossless. So if you want to get all paranoid and work up some conspiracy theories, it's OK. _________________ Stephen Kay - KARMA Developer • Karma-Lab - karma-lab.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Francois Approved Merchant
Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 4854 Location: Northants - UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
In other words, stop giving Korg some flac ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbox Junior Member
Joined: 25 Sep 2007 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
StephenKay wrote: | rbox wrote: | So why now must the Samples compressed and not 2005?Has the aspect of Soundquality to change in a another direction??Is the Bussystem for
uncompressed Samples too slow? |
You are getting all worked up about nothing. Trust me (or not). When they say it is lossless, it is lossless. That's why they didn't get back a savings of half of the memory or something. I know how it's being done, it's not my place to reveal it here, but it's lossless. So if you want to get all paranoid and work up some conspiracy theories, it's OK. |
I'm sorry,my knowledge in compression technique are poor,my conclusions was too early.So if it so like you and Korg say then it is very fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|